Terraform Labs Seeks Citadel Securities’ Trading Data amid SEC Lawsuit

Terraform Labs Pte. Ltd. (Movant), has filed a motion to compel market maker Citadel Securities, LLC to divulge crucial trading data. This data, pertinent to a third-party subpoena, is deemed critical for Terraform Labs’ defense against a lawsuit initiated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The lawsuit, presided over by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, delves into allegations of market destabilization due to purported intentional actions by certain market players to “short” and consequently cause the TerraUSD (UST) stablecoin to depeg from its $1 benchmark.

Disputing the SEC’s allegations, Terraform Labs argues that the market instability did not stem from the algorithm underpinning UST but was a result of orchestrated efforts by third-party market participants to manipulate the stablecoin’s value. The significant focus is on the trading activities around the May 2022 Depeg event, during which UST lost its peg to the dollar, crashing from $1 to $0.02. In light of this, Terraform Labs significantly narrowed down its subpoena requests, centering on the most critical trading data pertinent to this event.

Citadel Securities’ response was to provide a single document under the ongoing Confidentiality Order while refusing any further cooperation. The document in question pertains to trading strategies involving Terra-Native Tokens or Terra Financial Instruments between March 1, 2022, and May 31, 2022. Terraform Labs believes that unearthing this data is pivotal to understanding the May 2022 Depeg’s dynamics, examining Citadel Securities’ involvement, and whether there was a coordinated endeavor to short UST.

The motion filed accentuates the necessity for Citadel Securities to disclose the limited trading strategy information, urging the court to either grant this motion or transfer the matter to Hon. Jed S. Rakoff, the presiding judge in the Underlying Action. This motion trails an array of subpoenas issued to various market players, including Citadel Entities controlled by renowned short seller, Ken Griffin.

The crux of the matter extends to allegations by the SEC that Terraform Labs, spearheaded by founder Do Kwon, engaged in a multi-billion dollar crypto asset securities fraud. The SEC criticizes Terraform Labs for purported misrepresentations regarding the stability of UST and the effectiveness of its algorithm in maintaining the $1 price peg.

In a secondary narrative, the motion reveals discord chats hinting at Ken Griffin’s intention to short UST around May 2022, amplifying the discord between Terraform Labs and Citadel Securities. Despite Citadel Securities’ denial of trading TerraUSD in May 2022, as reported by Forbes, Terraform Labs persists in asserting that the requested documents are indispensable for a robust defense.

In a bid to expedite a favorable resolution, Terraform Labs has proposed transferring this matter to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York if the court declines to compel Citadel Securities. The ongoing litigation underscores the nuanced and complex nature of cryptocurrency-related cases, shedding light on the potential manipulative practices within digital asset markets.

Image source: Shutterstock

Source

Tagged : / / / / / / / / / /

Sushi Chef Addresses SEC Subpoena

Jared Grey, the head chef of Sushi, a Japan-based decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), recently issued a statement in response to a subpoena from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Grey reassured the Sushi community that, as far as he knows, no one associated with Sushi has violated U.S. federal security laws.

Grey also addressed the most frequently asked questions from the community regarding the subpoena in a FAQ format. He stated that he is cooperating with the SEC, but he has no knowledge of the SEC issuing subpoenas to anyone else associated with Sushi. However, Grey acknowledged that it is possible that the SEC may issue further subpoenas to others linked with Sushi in the future.

The SEC is responsible for regulating the securities markets and enforcing securities laws in the United States. The agency has recently taken an interest in the world of decentralized finance (DeFi) and blockchain-based financial instruments. In December 2020, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Ripple Labs, alleging that the company had sold unregistered securities in the form of its XRP cryptocurrency.

Grey’s statement comes at a time when DeFi is gaining significant traction and regulatory scrutiny. DAOs like Sushi are community-governed organizations that are collectively managed by their members. These organizations are designed to operate in a decentralized manner, with decision-making power distributed among their members.

Grey’s statement indicates that Sushi is taking the SEC’s inquiry seriously and is cooperating with the agency. The chef’s reassurance that no one associated with Sushi has violated U.S. federal security laws may ease the concerns of the Sushi community and other stakeholders.

However, the fact that Grey is cooperating with the SEC suggests that the agency is taking its investigation seriously. It is possible that the agency may uncover evidence of wrongdoing, either by individuals associated with Sushi or by the organization itself. If this were to occur, it could have significant implications for the wider DeFi ecosystem.

Overall, Grey’s statement provides some insight into the SEC’s inquiry into Sushi and the wider world of DeFi. While it is unclear at this stage whether the SEC will issue further subpoenas or take any other action, it is clear that the agency is taking a close interest in this emerging area of finance. As the DeFi ecosystem continues to evolve, it is likely that regulatory scrutiny will only increase, and DAOs like Sushi will need to ensure that they are operating within the bounds of applicable laws and regulations.

Source

Tagged : / / / / /

US SEC Issues Summons to Influencers Promoting HEX, PulseChain, PulseX

According to a media report released on Sunday, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has reportedly issued a subpoena to influencers who were found promoting crypto coins, such as HEX, PulseChain, and PulseX.

Over the weekend, Swedish researcher Eric Wall shared an official letter from the SEC dated November 1, which was addressed to the influencers. The letter said the influencers might possess documents and data relevant to an ongoing investigation conducted by the SEC staff.

The regulator accompanied the letter with a subpoena that was issued as part of the investigation, which demanded the influencers in question produce the required documents by November 15.

In recent years, the world has seen the rise of crypto influencers – individuals who use their social media platforms to promote cryptocurrencies and blockchain-based projects.

There is no doubt that crypto influencers have the potential to reach a vast audience and bring much-needed attention to the industry. However, many have recently been promoting dubious crypto projects and pump-and-dump schemes.

Recently, social media mogul Kim Kardashian has been involved in what the class action case considered a pump-and-dump scheme.

Last month, Kim Kardashian was charged $1.26 million by the SEC for failing to disclose that she was paid £250,0000 to promote EthereumMax cryptocurrency on her Instagram page.

SEC Chairman Gary Gensler said the case was a “reminder” that celebrity endorsement did not necessarily make a product worth investing in.

In August, Ben Armstrong, a prominent crypto influencer on his YouTube channel popularly known as BitBoy Crypto, narrated how he partnered with a cryptocurrency project that ended up being a scam.  

The problem is that most influencers are not financial experts and may not fully understand the risks involved in investing in cryptocurrency. Furthermore, influencers are paid to promote particular projects, which means that they may not be impartial.

Working with reputable brands with a good track record and transparency about their fees may help mitigate some of the risks associated with crypto investment.

Image source: Shutterstock

Source

Tagged : / / / / / /

US SEC Issues Summons to Influencers Promoting HEX, PulseChain, PulseX

According to a media report released on Sunday, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has reportedly issued a subpoena to influencers who were found promoting crypto coins, such as HEX, PulseChain, and PulseX.

Over the weekend, Swedish researcher Eric Wall shared an official letter from the SEC dated November 1, which was addressed to the influencers. The letter said the influencers might possess documents and data relevant to an ongoing investigation conducted by the SEC staff.

The regulator accompanied the letter with a subpoena that was issued as part of the investigation, which demanded the influencers in question produce the required documents by November 15.

In recent years, the world has seen the rise of crypto influencers – individuals who use their social media platforms to promote cryptocurrencies and blockchain-based projects.

There is no doubt that crypto influencers have the potential to reach a vast audience and bring much-needed attention to the industry. However, many have recently been promoting dubious crypto projects and pump-and-dump schemes.

Recently, social media mogul Kim Kardashian has been involved in what the class action case considered a pump-and-dump scheme.

Last month, Kim Kardashian was charged $1.26 million by the SEC for failing to disclose that she was paid £250,0000 to promote EthereumMax cryptocurrency on her Instagram page.

SEC Chairman Gary Gensler said the case was a “reminder” that celebrity endorsement did not necessarily make a product worth investing in.

In August, Ben Armstrong, a prominent crypto influencer on his YouTube channel popularly known as BitBoy Crypto, narrated how he partnered with a cryptocurrency project that ended up being a scam.  

The problem is that most influencers are not financial experts and may not fully understand the risks involved in investing in cryptocurrency. Furthermore, influencers are paid to promote particular projects, which means that they may not be impartial.

Working with reputable brands with a good track record and transparency about their fees may help mitigate some of the risks associated with crypto investment.

Image source: Shutterstock

Source

Tagged : / / / / / /

USDC Issuer Circle Served With Subpoena by SEC

Key Takeaways

  • Circle is under investigation by the SEC, the company revealed in regulatory filings on Monday.
  • The SEC reportedly requested documents and information regarding certain holdings, customer programs, and operations.
  • Circle said that it is “fully cooperating” with the investigation.


Share this article



Circle, the issuer of the USDC stablecoin, has revealed in regulatory filings that it received an “investigative subpoena” from the Securities and Exchange Commission in July 2021.

Circle Cooperates With SEC’s Investigation

Circle is under investigation by the SEC, the company revealed Monday.


According to an Oct. 4 regulatory filing, Circle received an “investigative subpoena” from SEC’s Enforcement Division in July 2021. The SEC requested “documents and information regarding certain of [Circle’s] holdings, customer programs, and operations,” said the filing.

Circle further revealed that it is “fully cooperating” with the investigation, which launched one month after the company released its high-interest yield product, Circle Yield. While Circle hasn’t revealed any extra details concerning the investigation, there are reasons to believe the subpoena might be related to the high yield product.

SIMETRI Research
Sanctor Turbo Demo Day


Last month, Coinbase, a member of the Centre Consortium and largest U.S.-based crypto exchange, was forced to abort the launch of a similar high-yield product, Coinbase Lend, after the SEC threatened the company with a lawsuit for issuing unregistered securities.

Judging by the SEC’s most recent comments and regulatory actions, it appears to have concerns with both crypto-related interest-bearing products and stablecoins. Earlier this year, the agency moved against interest-bearing account providers BlockFi and Celsius, alleging they’re offering unregistered securities. Additionally, in a September Senate hearing, SEC Chair Gary Gensler said that “stablecoins may well be securities,” explaining that the current securities laws are sufficiently broad.

The Circle filing is part of the company’s plan to go public via a special-purpose acquisition vehicle (SPAC) through a merger with Concord Acquisition Corp, valuing the firm at $4.5 billion. In early August, Circle revealed that it had applied for a banking charter, a move likely made in anticipation of the Biden administration’s plans to regulate all stablecoin issuers as banks.

Share this article




Source

Tagged : / / / / /
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 43,650.70 0.64%
Ethereum (ETH) $ 2,336.84 1.40%
Litecoin (LTC) $ 77.73 0.32%
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) $ 248.99 2.92%