Coinbase Puts Gnosis, Metal & Raydium on its Roadmap

U.S. Nasdaq-listed cryptocurrency trading platform Coinbase has updated its roadmap, adding two Ethereum-based altcoins, Gnosis (GNO) and Metal (MTL), and Solana-based blockchain project Raydium (RAY).

Gnosis builds decentralized infrastructure for the Ethereum ecosystem, a protocol designed to be a decentralized prediction market built on the Ethereum (ETH) blockchain.

Upon listing, Gnosis was up 5.43% in the last 24 hours. The live Gnosis price was trading at $143.10 with a 24-hour trading volume of $4,432,452.

Metal (MTL) is an Ethereum-based payment platform. Metal Pay allows users to register a free bank account and buy and sell over 50 cryptocurrencies. Metal’s price was $1.26 with a 24-hour trading volume of $14933541 during the intraday.

The third project goes to Raydium, an Automated Market Maker (AMM) and liquidity provider built on the Solana blockchain for the Serum Decentralized Exchange (DEX).

Raydium has the first-mover advantage as an AMM within Serum and will be an integral part of bringing new and existing projects and protocols into the ecosystem.

Coinbase’s latest move triggered RAY to surge 10% from $0.86 to $0.95.

In order to Increase transparency for new asset listings on Coinbase, Coinbase’s listing roadmap is a set of crypto projects that may be joining the exchange’s list of supported assets.

Image source: Shutterstock


Tagged : / / / / / / /

TVL, network outages, or derivatives: What’s behind Solana’s (SOL) 60%+ drop?

The past couple of months have not been kind to cryptocurrencies. The sector’s aggregate market capitalization plunged 50% from a Nov. 10 peak at $2.87 trillion to the current $1.44 trillion. Solana’s (SOL) downfall has been even more brutal, presently trading at $88 after a 66% correction since its $260 all-time-high.

Pinning the underperformance exclusively to the recent network outages seems too simplistic, and it doesn’t explain why the accelerated decoupling over the past week, so let’s take a look at what might be going on.

Solana/USDT at FTX (blue) vs. Total crypto capitalization (orange). Source: TradingView

The Solana network suffered four incidents in the span of a few months. According to the project’s developers, a sudden spike in the number of computing transactions caused network congestion which crippled the network.

Interestingly, the network struggles with congestion since the developers advertise a 50,000 transaction per second (TPS) capacity. The latest incident on Jan. 7 has been attributed to a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack, but data shows us that network attacks are less relevant than dApps use.

Cyber Capital chief investment officer Justin Bons criticized the network’s security, mentioning that DDoS can be used to “temporarily gain proportional-staked control over the network by attacking other stakeholders.”

Sergey Zhdanov, chief operating officer of crypto exchange EXMO UK, also said DDoS attacks and similar outages “don’t really influence the trust of the network” and should be disregarded. Zhdanov makes a point comparing Ethereum network fees surpassing $50 as a similar hiccup, but not significant enough to cause investors to abandon it for good.

Solana’s main decentralized application metric started to display weakness earlier in November after the network’s total value locked (TVL), which measures the amount deposited in its smart contracts, began to linger at $15 billion.

Solana network Total Value Locked, USD. Source: DefiLlama

Notice how Solana’s dApp deposits saw a 44% decrease in 3 months, as the indicator reached its lowest level since Sept. 8. As a comparison, Fantom’s TVL currently stands at $9.5 billion, a 79% increase in 3 months. Another dApp scaling solution competitor, Terra, saw a 60% TVL hike to $16 billion.

Not even the $10 million raised by Solana’s decentralized finance (DeFi) application Hubble Protocol in early January was enough to recover investors’ confidence. Crypto heavyweights like Three Arrows, Digital Currency Group, Delphi Digital and Capital backed the launch of the crypto-backed stablecoin and zero-interest borrowing platform.

TVL and the number of active addresses dropped

Total value locked is no longer the primary metric that reflects strong fundamentals, meaning a 66% price correction has other factors at play than just a reduced TVL. To confirm whether dApps use has effectively decreased, investors should also analyze the number of active addresses within the ecosystem.

Solana dApps 30-day on-chain data. Source: DappRadar

As shown by DappRadar data on Jan. 28, the number of Solana network addresses interacting with most decentralized applications dropped by 18% to 32%, except for the non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace Magic Eden.

The lesser interest on Solana dApps was also reflected in its futures open interest, which peaked at $2 billion on Nov. 6, but recently faced a steep correction.

Solana futures aggregate open interest. Source: Coinglass

The above chart shows how derivatives traders’ interest in Solana plunged 75% in less than 3 months. That is especially concerning because a smaller number of futures contracts might reduce the activity of arbitrage desks and market makers. For example, it is common for participants to self-limit their exposure to 20% of the asset volume or open interest.

Derivatives data could be a consequence, but not the cause

It’s probably impossible to pinpoint the correlation and causation between SOL’s price drop, the decrease in the network’s dApps use, and the fading interest from derivatives traders. However, none of those indicators point to a price recovery anytime soon.

The data above suggests that Solana holders should be less concerned about momentary outages and focus on the ecosystem’s use versus competing chains. As long as the ecosystem remains healthy, investors have no reason to lose trust due to temporary network outages.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision.