Instagram to Welcome NFTs Feature, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg Confirms

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Meta will add the Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) function to its video and photo social app Instagram in the coming months so that users might display their NFTs on the platform. - 2022-03-16T162016.702.jpg

Zuckerberg reportedly said at a South by Southwest forum Tuesday in Austin, Texas:

“We’re working on bringing NFTs to Instagram in the near term.”

Zuckerberg hopes that in the near future Instagram users will be able to mint their own NFTs on the platform. However, “I’m not ready to kind of announce exactly what that’s going to be today,” Zuckerberg refused to share specifics on when and how the framework might work.

Meta, formerly known as Facebook, its application Instagram reportedly developed non-fungible tokens (NFT) feature on its app, a mobile developer reveals since last July.

On the other hand, last June, Mobile developer Alessandro Paluzzi indicated that Instagram is working on NFT bidding options to users by providing a platform to sell their “Collectible” products on its platform. However, Instagram has yet to announce the launching of NFT on its platform or show any potential payment features on the platform.

Online adult content subscription platform OnlyFans has launched a feature for users to display verified NFTs as profile pictures, Blockchain.News reported on February 11. 

As reported by blockchain. News on January 21, social media platform Twitter announced that it was rolling out an official verification mechanism for NFT avatars, allowing some users to set the NFTs they own as their profile picture.

Following in the footsteps of Twitter, Reddit is eyeing to permit users to have NFT-based profile pictures through a feature that is being tested on January 27.

Image source: Shutterstock


Tagged : / / / / /

Vale Diem: How Facebook’s ambitious stablecoin project came to an end

On Jan. 31, Meta, formerly known as Facebook, announced that it was pulling from its stablecoin project, Diem, formerly known as Libra. Intellectual property and other assets related to the operations of the Diem Payment Network were to be sold to Silvergate Capital Corporation, essentially meaning the end to Mark Zuckerberg and his corporations’ stablecoin aspirations, at least in their current shape. This also marks the end of a once-groundbreaking initiative that was revealed in 2019 with a promise to bring a global alternative to fiat money to Facebook’s 2-billion-strong user base. Here is how this plan went from the initial announcement to the shutdown.

Phase 1: The white paper

The news of Facebook launching its own digital currency came as a boost of optimism for the social media giant, whose brand in the late 2010s came to be associated with the lack of privacy and ethics, as well as disfunctional governance.

On June 18, 2019, the company released the white paper of its prospective global stablecoin under the name “Libra.” The prospective asset was to be backed by its own blockchain on the operational side and by a reserve of various assets (a basket of bank deposits and short-term government securities) on the financial level.

From the very beginning, Libra didn’t try to pretend to be a decentralized cryptocurrency — its governance mechanism was designed as a consortium (the “Libra Association”) including big-name companies such as Mastercard, PayPal, Visa, Stripe, eBay, Coinbase, Andreessen Horowitz, Uber and others. Facebook itself was “expected to maintain a leadership role.” The social media giant also planned to maintain its influence by running a wallet, Calibra.

The project’s original positioning was to serve not as a speculative asset but as a service payment tool. The minting of new tokens was tied to the process of buyout by “authorized resellers” from among the association’s members.

Initial reception

The white paper received mixed feedback from the crypto community. Some of the industry opinion leaders decried the compromises that Facebook’s project had made in terms of both decentralization and security. Bitcoin (BTC) advocate Andreas Antonopoulos, for example, denied Libra the status of cryptocurrency on the basis that it lacked any of crypto’s fundamental characteristics, such as being public, neutral, censorship-resistant and borderless.

Others, however, preferred to focus not on the actual project’s design but on Libra’s potential effects on global crypto adoption. “Some of the biggest companies in the world are starting to recognize the promise of cryptocurrency and see its potential for changing the way consumers and businesses interact globally,” said Tron founder and CEO Justin Sun at the time.

But perhaps the most important thing about the Libra project was its potential to sidestep both existing crypto and fiat currencies alike — not by the virtue of its technical or design superiority but solely due to the network effects of having over 2 billion users on board from day one.

As Ross Buckley, a digital economy expert and professor at the University of New South Wales, warned in his paper, “Libra is perhaps the ultimate example of something that is highly likely to move from ‘too small to care’ to ‘too big to fail’ in a very short period of time […] This is an alternative money.” Buckley surely wasn’t alone in his fears — the obviousness of Libra’s inherent power predestined the enormous pressure it would get from the regulators.

Phase 2: Regulatory pushback

It took the United States Senate less than a month to get Libra co-creator David Marcus to testify at a special hearing, where the Facebook executive was exposed to a fervent grilling. Notably, it was not only Senator Sherrod Brown but also his perpetual opponent Senator Pat Toomey, who bombarded Marcus with hard questions (although Toomey also called not to “strangle the baby in the crib”). The news about Facebook’s private currency hadn’t gone unnoticed even by the then-President Donald Trump, who reacted in his signature expressive manner:

If Facebook and other companies want to become a bank, they must seek a new Banking Charter and become subject to all Banking Regulations, just like other Banks, both National and International.

The pushback was not confined to the United States. In September 2019, French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire declared that his country and the whole of Europe wouldn’t tolerate Facebook’s new project because the “monetary sovereignty of states is at stake.” Weeks later, the Bank of England issued a warning that, for it to become legal in the United Kingdom, Libra would have to meet all the necessary standards of traditional banking compliance.

What followed these statements was the first wave of backouts from some of the Libra Association’s founding members. With such companies as PayPal, Visa, Mastercard, eBay and Mercado Pago quitting the project, its image took a huge hit.

But back then, Facebook speakers played down the significance of these events. “Of course, it’s not great news in the short term, but in a way it’s liberating. Stay tuned for more very soon. Change of this magnitude is hard. You know you’re on to something when so much pressure builds up,” wrote Marcus on Twitter.

By October 2019, five European nations — France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands — had created an unofficial task force to prevent Libra’s launch in Europe. The pressure rose to the point when the CEO of the Netherlands’ largest bank, Ralph Hamers, publicly commented on the possibility to cut any operations with Facebook.

Phase 3: The rebranding that didn’t help

Facebook’s response to the pressure came in April 2020 in the form of “Libra 2.0.” The updated white paper introduced four key changes “to address regulatory concerns,” most notably of which was the switch from a single currency to a family of stablecoins, each backed by a single national currency (such as the U.S. dollar, euro and British pound).

As Brieanna Nicker from the Brookings Institute wrote at the time, “It also could be seen as a scaling back of Facebook’s ambitions, for the proposal is now more like a PayPal with a different technological backbone than a competitor to sovereign currencies.” Among other stated changes were the enhanced compliance framework and transition from a permissioned to permissionless blockchain within five years.

On Dec. 1, 2020, Facebook complemented the technical adjustments with a brand change: Libra became Diem, and Calibra became Novi. According to the company’s statement, this transition should have marked “a new day for the project.” The renaming came a week after the disclosure of a plan to launch the first USD-backed stablecoin.

At that time, the second version of the project was still officially opposed by the G7. Olaf Scholz, the current federal chancellor of Germany, who then served as a finance minister, called Diem “a wolf in sheep’s clothing,” stating that the name change hadn’t convinced the regulators.

Further pullbacks

The year 2021 didn’t bring good news for Diem. As the long-awaited launch has been delayed once again (by that time, Switzerland’s Financial Market Supervisory Authority still hadn’t granted grant Switzerland-based the Diem Association a payment license), on Feb. 23, the European Central Bank demanded from the European Union lawmakers a veto power to unilaterally block any private stablecoin projects when necessary.

In September 2021, The Washington Post reported on the ongoing attempts of Facebook’s top management to reach some compromise with U.S. regulators. But apparently, the negotiations stalled, as Marcus’ claim that Diem “has addressed every legitimate concern” caused public blowback from lawmakers.

The chairwoman of the House Financial Service Committee, Maxine Waters, retorted that rebranding had nothing to do with solving the major privacy, national security, consumer protection and monetary policy concerns. Top Republican member of the same committee, Representative Warren Davidson, sardonically mimicked Marcus’ blog post:

I’m not sure how Facebook and the Diem Association could have addressed ‘every legitimate concern’ whenever there’s overarching regulatory uncertainty that permeates many facets of the crypto space.

The last glimpse of hope sparked when, in a partnership with Binance, Facebook finally launched the pilot version of Novi Digital Wallet — a vital part of the planned Diem ecosystem. But it didn’t last longer than a few hours before a group of five senators wrote a joint letter to Zuckerberg with an unequivocal demand to “immediately discontinue” the project. In a casuistic response, the Diem Association tried to distance itself from Facebook.

On Dec. 1, Marcus, the formal head of Novi and the face of the Meta/Diem project, announced his resignation. Marcus, who had been working at Facebook since 2014, didn’t go into detail on the reasons for his decision, joining the list of Facebook’s key crypto figures who left in 2021, including fellow Diem co-founders Morgan Beller and Kevin Weil. With Marcus’ departure, it was hard to expect anything good in the upcoming 2022.

Is this the end for Diem?

Speaking to Cointelegraph immediately after the news of Facebook parting with Diem, Buckley, who had foreseen the regulatory reaction to the project back in 2019, shared his conviction that this is indeed the end of the stablecoin initiative: “I would be really surprised if it survives. It is a project designed to benefit from Facebook’s scale and reach and is now quite a scarred product.”

Buckley believes the company “profoundly mishandled the entire announcement” back in the day, overplaying its card as one of the biggest tech companies in the world. It surely wasn’t well-received by the wide range of regulators across the globe, as a digital currency with a user base of 2 billion was obviously far beyond the scope of a social media business:

Facebook took the classic tech company approach to this of surging ahead and then seeking forgiveness rather than seeking permission upfront. This may well work with telecoms […] but financial regulators expect to be treated with respect, as do governments with respect to their monetary sovereignty. The sharp resistance was in part because financial regulators and governments first learned of this from the media, not directly and well in advance, from Facebook.

Apart from Zuckerberg’s bravado that possibly played its role in Libra/Diem’s ultimate demise, this case could be seen as a hint to something more alarming. Facebook’s project of the world’s first global digital currency with an immediate mass adoption boost provoked instantaneous and concerted resistance from regulators.

What that means is that we can probably expect a response no less stiff and immediate should any other digital currency rise up to Diem’s adoption potential. As Buckley puts it, “The ability to mint the currency of the realm is a core element of sovereign capacity and has been for centuries.” And there’s no reason to believe that it won’t be defended ferociously. Hopefully, Diem’s example will serve as a reminder that the importance of regulatory negotiations should not be underestimated.


Tagged : / / / / / / / / / /

Mark Zuckerberg’s stablecoin project Diem officially shuts down

Meta, formerly branded as Facebook, has officially announced the closure of its digital currency project Diem after years of major efforts to move forward with the initiative.

Announcing the news on Monday, Diem CEO Stuart Levey confirmed that Meta is selling intellectual property and other assets related to the Diem stablecoin project to its Silvergate Capital Corporation.

The Diem Association and its subsidiaries will start winding down operations “over the coming weeks,” Levey said. The association, however, is still confident that Diem’s ideals will continue to thrive even after Meta officially terminated its involvement in the project, the CEO noted:

“We remain confident in the potential for a stablecoin operating on a blockchain designed like Diem’s to deliver the benefits that motivated the Diem Association from the beginning. With today’s sale, Silvergate will be well-placed to take this vision forward.”

According to an official announcement by Silvergate, the company will purchase assets of Diem for the aggregate value of $182 million. “As part of integrating the acquired assets into Silvergate’s existing technology, Silvergate expects to incur approximately $30 million of additional costs in 2022,” the firm said.

Specifically, Silvergate Bank, a subsidiary of Silvergate and Meta’s stablecoin partner, will integrate its payment platform, the Silvergate Exchange Network, with Diem’s assets. The new combination will help the bank launch a “next-generation global payment system that is faster, easier to use and more cost-effective than existing solutions,” the announcement notes.

“We identified a need for a U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin that is regulated and highly scalable to further enable them to move money without barriers. It remains our intention to satisfy that need by launching a stablecoin in 2022,” Silvergate CEO Alan Lane said.

Meta officially introduced its digital currency project back in 2019, originally called Libra and including a foundation of top global companies like Mastercard, PayPal, Visa, eBay and others. The project received massive global regulatory pushback, with financial authorities expressing major concerns over tech giants potentially taking over too much financial power.

Despite major regulatory pressure, Meta attempted to roll out some of its services in the United States, with WhatsApp messenger testing payments with Meta’s Novi wallet in December 2021.

“In the United States, a senior regulator informed us that Diem was the best-designed stablecoin project the U.S. government had seen,” CEO Levey stated.

Related: PayPal stablecoin: What it could mean for payments

While the Diem Association is wrapping its stablecoin, some of its original members are moving forward with their own stablecoin plans. In January, ​​PayPal officially confirmed that it was “exploring a stablecoin” that could be called PayPal Coin.


Tagged : / / / / / /

Zuck got PUNKed — new Metaverse-linked ETF shorts Meta shares in holdings

An exchange-traded fund linked to companies involved with the Metaverse launched on the Cboe BZX Exchange — shorting shares of Facebook’s parent company, Meta.

The Subversive Metaverse ETF, listed under the ticker PUNK, opened for trading at $25.15 on Thursday. The fund’s holdings include shares of Block — formerly Square — Google’s parent company Alphabet, Microsoft, Sony, GPU manufacturer Nvidia, Coinbase Global, Galaxy Digital and online gaming platform Roblox. However, exposure to Meta — one of the largest tech firms in the world, with a $837 market capitalization — was conspicuously absent from PUNK’s top holdings.

According to a Thursday Bloomberg report, Subversive Capital Advisor founder Michael Auerbach claimed the reputation around Facebook’s parent company — purportedly based on reports the firm was not doing what it claimed in regard to removing hate speech and posts encouraging violence — made it unsuitable for the ETF. The fund takes a short position on 40 Meta shares, the only one out of the 59 companies in its holdings.

“Facebook seems to be the antithesis of what actual consumers want their digital futures to look like,” said Auerbach. “Mark [Zuckerberg] and his team are not the best custodians of our digital futures.”

Christian Cooper, the ETF’s portfolio manager, added:

“We want to make sure this industry develops, without getting ‘Zucked-up’, from those who see the true potential of this space.”

Related: Meta unveils metaverse AI supercomputer, claims it will be world’s fastest

At the time of publication, the Metaverse ETF is trading at $24.74, having fallen more than 2% since opening. In December, ETF-issuer ProShares announced it had applied with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to list shares of a fund tracking the Solactive Metaverse Theme Index — with companies including Meta, Apple and Nvidia. However, there are also current listings for Metaverse-linked ETFs from Roundhill Ball, Evolve, Fount, and Horizons across the U.S. and Canada.