盗取Uniswap创始人Twitter账号的黑客最近几个月获利360万美元

在最近的一次网络安全事件中,Uniswap创始人Hayden Adams(@haydenzadams)的Twitter账户被自2023年4月以来一直活跃的骗子黑客攻击。这些犯罪分子在过去的几个月里创建了超过23个网络钓鱼网站,导致大约358名受害者损失了大约360万美元。

其中最重大的一起案件发生在2023年5月1日,当时一名用户由于ERC20许可钓鱼攻击,损失了价值228万美元的USDC。

Uniswap的官方Twitter账户几小时前发出了警告,声明,“@haydenzadams的Twitter账户已经被黑客攻击。请不要点击任何链接。没有任何赠品,空投,或赏金。该协议没有被黑客攻击或利用。”

Hayden Adams后来重新控制了他的Twitter账户,并对在事件期间提供帮助的人表示感谢。他发推文说,“我再次控制了我的Twitter。感谢今晚帮助的每一个人,以及人们为协助拆除,警告等所付出的努力。”

这次事件提醒我们,加密空间中的网络安全威胁始终存在。建议用户在点击链接时要谨慎,尤其是那些承诺赠品,空投或赏金的链接。始终从官方来源验证信息,并使用安全可信的平台进行加密交易。

Image source: Shutterstock

Source

Tagged : / / / /

Binance Now Ranked as the Second Largest Voting Power in Uniswap DAO

In a move that has become quite worrisome to Hayden Adams, the founder of the Uniswap decentralized exchange, Binance exchange has delegated as much as 13 million UNI tokens to the Uniswap DAO.

UNI2.jpg

This token automatically springboards Binance as the entity with the second-largest voting power after mega Venture Capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z). By the numbers, Binance now holds a 5.9% voting power as against the 6.7% that is commanded by a16z.

 

Taking to Twitter, Hayden said the UNI token belongs to Binance users, and that he remains unsure of how Binance intends to engage with the Uniswap DAO moving forward.

 

“..Binance delegated 13M UNI from its books, making it one of the largest UNI delegates (this is only 1.3% of current delegated UNI so governance voting power remains quite distributed). Very unique situation, as the UNI technically belongs to its users,” He said in a tweet shared earlier today.

 

DAOs are an automated and decentralized governance engine and they help to decide the directions through which the Uniswap protocol will trend per time. 

 

While Hayden acknowledges that the vote distribution is still well optimized and as such, the Binance newly delegated tokens will not affect its integrity, he still called out to the bigger exchange’s founder and CEO, Changpeng Zhao to come to talk or give insights on the trading platform’s plans.

 

“Normally more gov participation = good, however it’s unclear how binance intends to engage. Binance users would prob prefer to keep these gov rights (similar to what compound has done with cUNI). In the spirit of transparency would love to hear from @cz_binance on their plans.”


DAOs have been proposed as a major alternative, a blockchain-powered corporate tool for running an organization. While some DAOs, like the Uniswap DAO, have functioned perfectly well over time, others, such as the Panda DAO have run into troubles with proposals for the dissolution of the DAO.

Image source: Shutterstock

Source

Tagged : / / / /

Uniswap v3 flips v2 on volume — and both versions flip Bitcoin on fee revenue

The world’s largest decentralized exchange keeps growing and the newly-launched third iteration has now surpassed version two in terms of daily volumes.

In addition to v3 topping the daily transaction volumes of v2, both have individually surpassed Bitcoin in terms of daily fee generation. The move was observed by Uniswap founder Hayden Adams who commented that both are earning more daily and weekly fees than Bitcoin miners.

Data from Cryptofees showed that Uniswap v3, which was launched on May 5, generated $4.5 million with v2 generating $3.8 million in fees for the day. Bitcoin was behind both of them at the time with $3.7 million in daily fee generation.

At the time of writing, the website was reporting that Uniswap v3 generated $4.1 million in the current 24 hour period whereas v2 is in second place with $3.2 million. SushiSwap is the next largest DEX after Uniswap with $2.135 million. Bitcoin and Ethereum estimates were not available for the past 24 hours but the previous day’s fees on Bitcoin hit $2.821 million, while Ethereum raked in $28.71 million.

Critics often blame high Ethereum gas fees on Uniswap for being responsible, but the revenue figures are actually swapping fees paid to liquidity providers rather than gas fees.

In terms of daily transaction volumes, v3 has now surpassed v2 with $1.48 billion over the past 24 hours according to Uniswap’s analytics page. Version 2 had a reported daily volume of $1.1 billion. For total value locked, v2 still dominates with $5.8 billion compared to $1.46 billion on v3.

On May 20, Cointelegraph reported Messari’s prediction that v3 would surpass v2 by volume this month.

Uniswap’s success has been so prominent that finance industry bible The Wall Street Journal has picked up on it, suggesting the DEX and others like it posed a growing threat to Coinbase. A report on May 24 stated that Uniswap had a volume of $36.6 billion in April, compared with $110 billion at Coinbase.

It added that Coinbase listed competition from decentralized exchanges as a potential business risk before going public last month.

It may not end up as an ‘either/or’ situation but end up with ‘both’ benefiting. Adams predicted that centralized exchanges would eventually tap into Uniswap’s liquidity pools, “essentially becoming front-end interfaces with slick apps and websites that rely on Uniswap behind the scenes to power trading.”