Tag: Blockchain Association

US Regulator Crypto Custody Proposal Opposed

by Blockchain News

In response to the SEC’s proposal to amend its custody rule, the Blockchain Association and Andreessen Horowitz have filed letters of opposition. The Blockchain Association claimed that the rule would limit investment in digital assets and could leave investors’ assets at more risk. Meanwhile, Andreessen Horowitz stated that the rule could prevent registered investment advisers from transacting with crypto exchanges and violate the SEC’s duty of care requirements.

The proposal, which has not yet been approved by the SEC, aims to impose more stringent rules on investment advisers in the custody of assets, including crypto. The proposed measures include proper segregation of assets and annual audits from public accountants, among other transparency measures.

The SEC’s Chair, Gary Gensler, has specifically targeted crypto exchanges with the rule, claiming that some crypto trading platforms offering custody services are not qualified custodians. However, even within the SEC, Commissioner Hester Pierce has questioned the rule’s workability and breadth, suggesting that it appears to be targeting crypto and crypto-related companies.

The Blockchain Association and Andreessen Horowitz have both argued that the rule exceeds the SEC’s authority and would have a negative impact on investment in digital assets. They have also claimed that the proposed measures would prevent investment advisers from using crypto and could leave investors’ assets at greater risk.

Despite opposition from industry proponents and within the SEC itself, the proposal remains under consideration. It is yet to be seen whether the SEC will make any changes to the rule in response to the letters of opposition.

Source

Tagged : / / / / /

Blockchain Association Seeks Information on De-banking of Crypto Companies

by Blockchain News

The Blockchain Association, a cryptocurrency advocacy group, has filed additional Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) requests to regulators in the US. The group had initially filed for information from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The new requests were submitted to the Federal Housing Finance Agency and the New York Department of Financial Services, seeking further information on the de-banking of crypto-friendly banks.

The organization is interested in learning more about the de-banking of cryptocurrency companies after the closure of Signature Bank and the failure of Silvergate Bank. These two banks were known for their friendly stance towards cryptocurrency-related businesses, but both were closed down, leaving many companies in the crypto industry without a banking partner.

The Blockchain Association believes that these closures were a result of regulatory pressure, and that the lack of transparency around the issue is problematic for the industry. By filing these FOIL requests, the group hopes to shed more light on the situation and ensure that the regulatory process is fair and transparent.

The de-banking of crypto companies has been a contentious issue for some time. Many banks are hesitant to work with companies in the industry due to concerns around money laundering and other illegal activities. However, for companies in the crypto space, having a banking partner is essential for conducting day-to-day business operations.

The closure of Signature Bank and Silvergate Bank has highlighted the fragility of the relationship between banks and cryptocurrency companies. The Blockchain Association is seeking to understand what led to the closures and whether there was any unfair regulatory pressure involved.

This is not the first time that the Blockchain Association has filed FOIL requests to obtain information about the regulation of cryptocurrency-related businesses. The group has been a vocal advocate for the industry and has worked to ensure that regulators take a fair and balanced approach to the sector.

As the crypto industry continues to grow, it is likely that we will see more regulation and scrutiny from regulators. The actions of the Blockchain Association demonstrate the importance of transparency and accountability in this process, and highlight the challenges faced by companies operating in this space. By working together with regulators, the industry can ensure that it continues to thrive and innovate, while also addressing legitimate concerns around security and illegal activity.

Source

Tagged : / / / / / /

Crypto Advocacy Group Calls on Regulators to Address De-Banking of Crypto Firms

by Blockchain News

The recent failures of banks providing services to crypto firms in the United States have raised concerns in the crypto community about a perceived “de-banking” of the industry. In response, the Blockchain Association has called on financial regulators to provide information about their actions in relation to the banks’ failures. The association has submitted Freedom of Information Act requests to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the board of governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, seeking documents and communications that could potentially show if regulators’ actions “improperly contributed” to the banks’ collapse.

The Blockchain Association believes that crypto firms should be treated like any other law-abiding business in the U.S. and given access to bank accounts. The association is investigating allegations of account closures and refusals to open new accounts by banks against crypto firms, which it believes are part of a wider trend of de-banking the industry.

The recent banking crisis in the crypto industry began with the announcement by Silvergate’s parent company on March 8 that it would “wind down operations” for the crypto bank. This was followed by Silicon Valley Bank’s own failure after a run on deposits on March 10, and the closure of Signature Bank on March 12 by regulators. Some in the crypto community believe that federal regulators’ perceived attack on banks servicing crypto firms could force companies to turn to “shadier” options.

Prior to its closure, Signature Bank was considered a major crypto-friendly bank in the U.S., providing services to Coinbase, Paxos Trust, BitGo, and Celsius. The FDIC’s resolution handbook states that an acquirer tells the FDIC what assets and liabilities from the failed bank it is willing to take, as well as what (if any) money will change hands.

Former U.S. Representative and Signature board member Barney Frank reportedly claimed the FDIC was sending a “strong anti-crypto message” in shutting down the bank, and some lawmakers are demanding answers. The recent actions by regulators have prompted concerns in the crypto community about the potential for a wider crackdown on the industry by regulators. The Blockchain Association’s calls for transparency from financial regulators are part of wider efforts to ensure that crypto firms are treated fairly and given access to banking services like any other business.

Source

Tagged : / / / / /

Blockchain Association executive debunks rumored crypto crackdown by Treasury

by Cointelegraph

Kristin Smith, executive director of the Blockchain Association has dismissed fears that the United States Department of the Treasury was close to cracking down on Bitcoin (BTC) and cryptocurrencies.

Indeed, rumors of the Treasury bringing money laundering charges against some financial institutions using cryptocurrencies began circulating on social media over the weekend.

The report emerged during a period of massive selloffs in the crypto space with the market capitalization dropping over $240 million as Bitcoin slid to $52,000.

In an interview with CNBC, Smith debunked the reports, stating that it was the Department of Justice’s remit to charge companies with money laundering.

Janet Yellen, the secretary of the U.S. Treasury is a noted crypto critic who in February characterized the apparent misuse of cryptocurrencies for illegal activities as a growing concern.

Meanwhile, several studies show the criminal usage of cryptocurrencies accounts for a minute proportion of global crypto commerce. Indeed, Michael Morell, a former acting director of the Central Intelligence Agency recently published a paper showing that the broad generalization of virtual currencies as conduits for criminal financing was exaggerated.

Morell’s paper also concluded that blockchain forensic tools are sufficiently robust to detect illicit crypto transactions.

Commenting on the efforts by crypto stakeholders to remedy the disinformation in Washington regarding the industry, Smith remarked that several market actors are contributing more resources in positive lobbying efforts on the Hill.

Earlier in April, prominent organizations in the cryptocurrency space like Coinbase and Square announced a new lobbying initiative dubbed the Crypto Council for Innovation. Apart from the Blockchain Association, other groups like Coin Center are also pushing for sensible virtual currency regulations in America.

For Smith, events like the Coinbase listing on Nasdaq offer proof of the growing market validation for the crypto industry, a phenomenon that authorities in Washington can hardly overlook.