The US Treasury and a number of top financial regulators have suggested new rules to make it easier for the Federal Reserve to designate nonbank financial institutions as systemically important. This move would make it easier for the government to supervise and regulate these institutions. During a recent Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) Council Meeting, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen expressed concerns over the lack of supervision of nonbank financial institutions and their potential to cause wider financial contagion during periods of distress.

Nonbank financial institutions are entities that provide specific financial services but do not hold a bank license and are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). This includes venture capital firms, crypto companies, and hedge funds. Yellen noted that the existing guidance issued in 2019 created inappropriate hurdles during the designation process for nonbank status for major financial firms, a process that currently takes up to six years.

Yellen added that the new guidance measures would remove these hurdles and streamline the designation process for nonbank status. The new, shorter oversight and designation process will still allow regulators and institutions enough time to communicate and discuss specifics. The new guidance will replace the 2019-era rules with an analysis process where the council determines if “material financial distress at the company or the company’s activities could pose a threat to U.S. financial stability.”

Yellen also referred to the recent collapses of crypto- and tech-friendly banks such as Silvergate Bank, Signature Bank, and Silicon Valley Bank, which caused the worst banking crisis since 2008. She reassured both investors and everyday citizens that the US banking sector remains robust and secure. Yellen warned that the recent banking crisis is a clear example of why greater oversight and emergency provisions should be granted to FSOC and the Federal Reserve.

In rewriting the article, it’s important to note that the US Treasury’s recent proposal to ease oversight of nonbank financial institutions is not an isolated event. Rather, it is part of a larger effort to reform financial regulations in the US. This effort began following the 2008 financial crisis, which exposed weaknesses in the regulatory framework that governed the US financial system.

One of the key pieces of legislation that emerged from this effort was the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. This act created the FSOC, a council made up of the heads of the major US financial regulatory agencies. The FSOC was charged with identifying and addressing threats to US financial stability, including those posed by nonbank financial institutions.

The 2019-era rules that Yellen referenced were put in place to make it more difficult for the FSOC to designate nonbank financial institutions as systemically important. The designation comes with a number of regulatory requirements, including higher capital buffers and more frequent stress tests. Nonbank financial institutions argued that the rules were overly burdensome and unnecessary.

However, Yellen and other regulators argued that the 2019-era rules created too many hurdles and slowed down the designation process. They also pointed out that nonbank financial institutions were playing an increasingly important role in the US financial system and needed to be subject to greater oversight.

The new guidance proposed by the US Treasury and other regulators seeks to strike a balance between the need for oversight and the concerns of nonbank financial institutions. The guidance would create a more streamlined designation process that still allows for enough time for regulators and institutions to communicate and discuss specifics.

Source