Crypto-friendly banks closure could pose a challenge for crypto companies

The closure of three major crypto-friendly banks in the US, Signature Bank, Silicon Valley Bank, and Silvergate Bank, has sent shockwaves across the digital asset industry. According to some in the crypto community, this could pose a significant challenge for crypto companies in accessing traditional banking partners.

On March 12, the Federal Reserve announced the closure of Signature Bank, citing “systemic risk” as the reason for the bank’s closure. It came only days after the closure of Silicon Valley Bank, which was ordered to shut down on March 10. A week prior, Silvergate Bank, another crypto-friendly bank, announced that it would close its doors and voluntarily liquidate on March 8.

At least two of these banks were seen as important banking pillars for the crypto industry. Signature Bank had $88.6 billion in deposits as of Dec. 31, according to insurance documents. The Silvergate Exchange Network (SEN) and Signature Bank’s “Signet” were real-time payment platforms that allowed commercial crypto clients to make real-time payments in dollars at any time. Their loss could mean that “crypto liquidity could be somewhat impaired,” according to comments from Nic Carter of Castle Island Ventures in a March 12 CNBC report. He said that both Signet and SEN were key for firms to get fiat in but hoped that other banks would step up to fill the void.

Crypto investor Scott Melker, also known as The Wolf Of All Streets, believes that the collapse of the three banks will leave crypto companies “basically” without banking options. “Silvergate, Silicon Valley, and Signature all shuttered. Depositors will be made whole, but there’s basically nobody left to bank crypto companies in the US,” he said.

Meltem Demirors, chief strategy officer of digital asset manager Coinshares, shared similar concerns on Twitter, highlighting that in just one week, “crypto in America has been unbanked.” She noted that SEN and Signet “are the most challenging to replace.”

However, some in the industry believe that the closure of the three firms will create room for another bank to step up and fill the vacuum. Jake Chervinsky, head of policy at crypto policy promoter the Blockchain Association, said the closure of the banks would create a “huge gap” in the market for crypto-friendly banking. “There are many banks that can seize this opportunity without taking on the same risks as these three. The question is if banking regulators will try to stand in the way,” he added.

Meanwhile, others have suggested that there are already viable alternatives out there. Mike Bucella, General Partner at BlockTower Capital, told CNBC many in the industry are already changing to Mercury Bank and Axos Bank. “Near-term, crypto banking in North America is a tough place,” he said. “However, there is a long tail of challenger banks that may take up that slack.”

Ryan Selkis, CEO of blockchain research firm Messari, noted that the incidents have seen “Crypto’s banking rails” shuttered in less than a week, with a warning of the future for USDC. “Next up, USDC. The message from DC is clear: crypto is not welcome here,” he said. “The entire industry should be fighting like hell to protect and promote USDC from here on out. It’s the last stand for crypto in the US,” Selkis added.

USDC, which is the second-largest stablecoin by market capitalization, has been hit hard by the recent bank closures. Circle, the issuer of USDC, confirmed on March 10 that wires initiated to move its balances at Silicon Valley Bank had not yet been processed, leaving $3.3 billion of its $40 billion USDC reserves at SV. The news prompted USDC to waver against its peg, dropping below 90 cents at times on major exchanges.

However, as of March 13, USDC was climbing back to its $1 peg following confirmation from CEO Jeremy Allaire that its reserves are safe and the firm has new banking partners lined up. Despite the recent challenges, many in the crypto community believe that stablecoins like USDC will play a vital role in the future of digital assets.

The closure of these crypto-friendly banks has raised concerns among regulators, who fear that it could lead to a loss of confidence in the banking system. Some experts believe that regulators may step in to prevent other banks from taking on the risks associated with serving crypto companies.

However, others argue that regulators should not stand in the way of innovation and that banks should be allowed to serve the needs of the crypto industry. They believe that crypto companies should be treated like any other legitimate business and that they should have access to banking services.

The recent bank closures also highlight the need for crypto companies to have robust risk management strategies in place. As the industry continues to grow, it will face increasing regulatory scrutiny, and companies will need to be prepared to navigate these challenges.

In conclusion, the closure of three major crypto-friendly banks in the US has raised concerns about the future of digital assets in the country. While some in the industry believe that it could create room for another bank to step up and fill the vacuum, others are concerned that it may leave crypto companies without banking options. The recent challenges faced by stablecoins like USDC also highlight the need for robust risk management strategies in the digital asset industry. Despite the challenges, many in the crypto community remain optimistic about the future of digital assets and believe that they will play a vital role in the global economy.


Tagged : / / / / /

Crypto Firms Report Funds Tied Up with Shuttered Signature Bank

On March 12, New York regulators and the United States Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation shut down Signature Bank, a crypto-friendly bank that had reportedly become a systemic risk to the US economy. As news of the shutdown spread, several crypto firms came forward to report that they had funds tied up with the bank.

Coinbase, one of the largest crypto exchanges in the world, announced via Twitter that it had around $240 million in corporate funds at Signature Bank that it expected to be fully recovered. Stablecoin issuer and crypto firm Paxos also reported that it had $250 million held at the bank, but noted that it held private insurance that covered the amount not covered by the standard FDIC insurance of $250,000 per depositor.

Celsius, a crypto lender that recently filed for bankruptcy, reported that Signature Bank had held some of its funds, but did not disclose the amount. However, the Celsius Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, which represents the interests of account holders, added that “all depositors will be made whole.”

As news of the shutdown and related crypto exposure spread, other firms in the crypto industry came forward to quell fears about their related exposures. Robbie Ferguson, co-founder of Web3 game development platform Immutable X, and Mitch Liu, co-founder of the media-focused Theta Network blockchain, both separately tweeted that their respective companies had no exposure to Signature. also reported in a tweet by CEO Kris Marszalek that it had no funds in the bank. Similarly, Paolo Ardoino, the chief technology officer of stablecoin firm Tether, tweeted that Tether had no exposure to Signature Bank.

While some firms expect to recover their funds in full, the closure of Signature Bank has raised concerns about the risks associated with the crypto industry. In addition to the shutdown of Signature Bank, the Federal Reserve announced that the FDIC had been approved to take actions to protect depositors at Silicon Valley Bank, a tech-startup-focused bank that had experienced liquidity issues due to a bank run that spread contagion to the crypto sector. The Fed also announced a $25 billion program to ensure ample liquidity for banks to cover the needs of their customers during times of turbulence.

Overall, the closure of Signature Bank highlights the challenges and risks associated with the rapidly growing and often unpredictable crypto industry. While some firms may be able to recover their funds, others may face significant losses, underscoring the need for greater regulatory oversight and risk management in the sector.


Tagged : / / / / / / /

Nissan Expands Web3 Efforts with Trademarks and Metaverse Auto Sales

Nissan has become the latest car manufacturer to increase its Web3 efforts by filing four new Web3-related trademarks in the United States. The trademarks, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on March 7, cover its Infiniti, Nismo, and Nissan brands. The filings reveal Nissan’s plans to create virtual goods such as clothes, cars, headgear, trading cards, toys, tickets, and a nonfungible token (NFT) marketplace for trading and minting NFTs. Additionally, the company has outlined plans for metaverse advertising services and other “entertainment services” covering online video, images, artwork, tickets, audio, sounds, music, and trading cards. Nissan also plans to create a website with information about its proposed NFTs and how they will work, as well as “non-downloadable computer software for use as a digital wallet.”

In addition to its Web3-related trademark filings, Nissan Japan announced on March 8 that it is conducting a three-month “demonstration experiment” of its virtual store “Nissan Hype Lab.” The virtual store allows customers to “study, consult, test drive and purchase Nissan vehicles” while in the metaverse. Customers can visit the virtual storefront “24 hours a day” via a PC or smartphone and can create their own customized avatars. During certain hours, customers can even interact with virtual sales staff. According to the announcement, customers can order the car and finalize purchase contracts through this virtual sales office. Nissan Japan plans to examine the possibility of new sales methods for cars through this trial, which runs from March 8 to June 30.

Nissan’s recent moves are in line with other car manufacturers, including General Motors and Ford, who have also been actively filing trademark applications for Web3, crypto, NFTs, and the metaverse. General Motors filed trademark applications covering its Chevrolet and Cadillac brands on Feb. 16, while Ford Motor Company filed 19 trademark applications across its major car brands in September 2022. According to trademark attorney Mike Kondoudis, the car brands’ filings signaled plans for NFT-backed media, online NFT marketplaces, digital wallets, NFT minting, trading, and storing software.

Despite the ongoing crypto winter and bear market, multinational corporations are still pushing forward with trademark applications covering Web3, crypto, NFTs, and the metaverse. Kondoudis said there were record numbers of trademark applications for NFTs, metaverse, and crypto-related products in 2022. As companies like Nissan continue to invest in Web3 and the metaverse, it is clear that they see the potential for these technologies to revolutionize not just the automotive industry, but many other industries as well.


Tagged : / / / / /

Solo Bitcoin Miner Wins Rare Block Reward Worth Over $150,000

Bitcoin mining is the process by which miners add new blocks to the Bitcoin blockchain. Miners must use computational power to solve complex mathematical equations to create a valid block hash. When a miner successfully creates a valid block hash, they receive a block reward of new bitcoins as well as transaction fees.

Solo mining, where a miner attempts to mine a block on their own, is becoming increasingly difficult as the network hash rate and the power of mining machines continue to rise. It is rare for a solo miner to solve a block on their own, and it typically takes them several months to do so.

However, the solo miner behind the recent block reward was able to achieve this feat in just two days. It is speculated that they may have rented hashing power to increase their chances of producing a valid hash quickly.

The miner used the Solo CK Pool mining service, which allows solo miners to create a mining pool with just one mining rig. This enables solo miners to increase their chances of earning block rewards by combining their hashing power with that of other solo miners.

The Solo CK mining pool has a history of producing solo-mined Bitcoin blocks. In January 2022, the pool was responsible for two solo-mined blocks, occurring just two weeks apart.

While solo mining is becoming increasingly difficult, there are still many miners who prefer to mine on their own rather than joining a mining pool. Solo mining allows miners to have complete control over their mining operations and to keep all of the rewards for themselves.

However, as the difficulty of mining solo continues to increase, more miners are likely to join mining pools to increase their chances of earning block rewards. Despite this, there will always be solo miners who are willing to take on the challenge of mining Bitcoin on their own.


Tagged : / / / / /

Binance converts remaining $1 billion in Industry Recovery Initiative to native crypto amidst concerns around stablecoins

On March 13, CZ tweeted that due to the changes in stablecoins and banks, Binance will be converting the remaining $1 billion funds in its Industry Recovery Initiative to native crypto. The native cryptocurrencies listed by CZ included Bitcoin (BTC), BNB (BNB), and Ether (ETH). He also posted links to the hash ID for the BTC and ETH transactions, revealing that $980 million took 15 seconds to move with a $1.98 transaction fee.

However, the decision by the Binance co-founder to sell the Binance USD (BUSD) stablecoin and convert the fund to more “volatile” assets received mixed reactions on Crypto Twitter. Some praised the decision, while others questioned the move to sell stablecoins and convert the fund to more volatile assets.

The depegging of the USDC stablecoin was caused by the failure of three major crypto-friendly banks – Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Silvergate Bank, and Signature Bank. Circle, the company behind USDC, disclosed on March 10 that it had around $3.3 billion tied up at SVB. This caused the USDC stablecoin to fall to as low as $0.87 from its $1 peg. However, by March 13, USDC had bounced back towards its $1 peg and is currently hovering around $0.99. Circle also has an undisclosed amount of reserve funds stuck in Silvergate, another US-based crypto-friendly bank that went bankrupt.

The instability surrounding USDC caused a domino effect on other stablecoins such as Dai (DAI), USDD, and FRAX, which also slipped from their $1 peg. Since the events began unfolding on March 10, the crypto space has been on edge as to what will happen next. Twitter users have claimed that there is “nobody left to bank crypto companies.”

This recent event highlights the concerns surrounding stablecoins and the reliance of the crypto industry on traditional banking systems. As a result, some experts are suggesting the need for a decentralized banking system that is not reliant on centralized entities such as banks. In the meantime, it remains to be seen how stablecoins and the crypto industry will adapt to these challenges and uncertainties.


Tagged : / / / / / /

Cryptocurrency Community Debates Fallout from Closure of Major American Banks

The closure of three major American banks that serve cryptocurrency firms has sent shockwaves through the broader cryptocurrency community. Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), which has traditionally served startups across several innovation sector industries, was shuttered by California’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation on March 10, while Signature Bank met a similar fate on March 12. The closures have sparked a debate within the cryptocurrency community about the risks of traditional finance institutions that serve fiat currency deposits, withdrawals, and monetary flows.

The reasons surrounding the closures are still coming to light, but they have caused particular concern within the cryptocurrency community due to their exposure to stablecoins. USD Coin (USDC) issuer Circle, for instance, had over $3.3 billion of its $40 billion reserves locked up in SVB, which caused major uncertainty around the effect Circle’s exposure would have on its ability to manage redemptions. As a result, the USDC stablecoin briefly lost its $1 peg. However, USDC has seen its peg creep back up to the $1 mark after Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire announced that the stablecoin issuer has lined up new banking partners in the United States.

The closure of the banks has also led the cryptocurrency ecosystem to take a closer look at neobank services that could potentially bypass or serve to bridge gaps exposed in the latest mainstream banking failure. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong took to Twitter on March 13 to discuss the need for more innovative solutions in the cryptocurrency industry. According to Armstrong, Coinbase has previously considered features that could potentially address the risks associated with traditional finance institutions.

One of the biggest risks associated with traditional finance institutions for cryptocurrency firms is the risk of bank runs. This was a major concern for Signature Bank, which was taken over by the New York Department of Financial Services to prevent further bank runs as customers scrambled to pull funds from SVB and Signature. As a result, there is a growing demand within the cryptocurrency community for neobank services that can offer stability and security.

One potential solution that has been proposed is for cryptocurrency firms to create their own neobank services. This would allow them to bypass the risks associated with traditional finance institutions altogether and create a more secure and stable financial ecosystem for the cryptocurrency industry. However, creating a neobank from scratch is not without its challenges, particularly in terms of regulatory compliance and capital requirements.

Another potential solution is to partner with existing neobank services that have already established themselves as trustworthy and reliable institutions. This would allow cryptocurrency firms to benefit from the stability and security offered by neobank services without having to build their own from scratch. However, this approach would still require regulatory compliance and would require cryptocurrency firms to give up some control over their financial ecosystem.

Regardless of the approach taken, it is clear that the closure of major American banks that serve cryptocurrency firms has exposed significant risks associated with traditional finance institutions. As a result, the cryptocurrency ecosystem is now exploring new ways to create a more stable and secure financial ecosystem that can support the growing demand for cryptocurrencies and stablecoins. Whether through the creation of new neobank services or through partnerships with existing institutions, the cryptocurrency industry is working to build a financial ecosystem that can weather the challenges of the traditional financial sector.

In addition to neobank services, the cryptocurrency industry is also exploring other innovative solutions to address the risks associated with traditional finance institutions. For example, decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms have emerged as a potential alternative to traditional banking services. DeFi platforms operate on blockchain technology and allow users to access financial services without relying on intermediaries like banks. By eliminating intermediaries, DeFi platforms can reduce the risks associated with traditional banking and offer greater transparency and security to users.

However, DeFi platforms are still in their early stages of development and are not yet able to offer the same level of stability and security as traditional banking services. Furthermore, they are currently facing significant regulatory challenges, particularly in the United States, where regulatory authorities are grappling with how to regulate DeFi platforms.

Despite these challenges, the growth of the cryptocurrency industry shows no signs of slowing down. In fact, many experts predict that cryptocurrencies and stablecoins will become increasingly important in the global financial system in the years to come. As a result, it is becoming increasingly important for the cryptocurrency industry to develop a stable and secure financial ecosystem that can support the growing demand for these new financial instruments.

In conclusion, the closure of three major American banks that serve cryptocurrency firms has sparked a debate within the cryptocurrency community about the risks of traditional finance institutions. As a result, the industry is now exploring new ways to create a more stable and secure financial ecosystem that can support the growing demand for cryptocurrencies and stablecoins. Whether through the creation of new neobank services, partnerships with existing institutions, or the development of DeFi platforms, the cryptocurrency industry is working to build a financial ecosystem that can weather the challenges of the traditional financial sector.


Tagged : / / / / /

Euler Finance Suffers Flash Loan Attack, Loses Millions in Multiple Cryptocurrencies

On March 13, 2023, Euler Finance, an Ethereum-based noncustodial lending protocol, became the victim of a flash loan attack. The attacker managed to steal millions in various cryptocurrencies, including Dai, USD Coin, staked Ether, and wrapped Bitcoin. According to on-chain data, the exploiter carried out multiple transactions and stole nearly $196 million, making it the largest hack of the year.

The breakdown of stolen funds is as follows: $87 million in Dai, $51 million in USDC, $40 million in stETH, and $17 million in WBTC. Euler Finance has not yet made an official statement regarding the attack, and it remains unclear whether the stolen funds will be recovered.

Crypto analytic firm Meta Seluth stated that the attack is related to a deflation attack that occurred one month ago. The attacker used a multichain bridge to transfer the funds from the Binance Smart Chain (BSC) to Ethereum and launched the attack today. ZachXBT, another prominent on-chain sleuth, reiterated the same and said that the movement of funds and the nature of the attack seem quite similar to the black hats that exploited a BSC-based protocol last month.

The attack on Euler Finance highlights the risks associated with flash loans, which are uncollateralized loans that allow traders to borrow large amounts of capital without putting up any assets as collateral. Flash loans have become increasingly popular in the DeFi space and have been used in several high-profile attacks, including the $600 million hack of Poly Network in August 2021.

Flash loan attacks are a growing concern for the DeFi ecosystem, and several projects have taken steps to mitigate the risks associated with these loans. For example, Aave, a popular DeFi lending platform, has implemented a cooldown period for flash loans, requiring borrowers to wait for a period before taking out another loan. Similarly, Compound Finance has implemented a fee on flash loans to deter attackers.

Euler Finance is just the latest DeFi project to fall victim to a flash loan attack, highlighting the need for better security measures in the DeFi ecosystem. As the DeFi space continues to grow, it is essential to implement robust security measures to protect users’ funds and prevent attacks like these from happening in the future.


Tagged : / / / / /

Privacy blockchain platform Aztec to shut down Aztec Connect

Privacy blockchain platform Aztec has announced that it will be shutting down Aztec Connect, the network’s privacy infrastructure that acts as the encryption layer for Ethereum. The network was launched in July 2022 and has since amassed more than 100,000 users. However, the company has now officially announced that it will be closing down the service.

The closure of Aztec Connect will involve disabling deposits from front-ends like and on March 17. Users will be able to withdraw their funds from Aztec Connect with no fees for one year, but withdrawals will become significantly more burdensome after March 21, 2024, according to a blog post by Aztec. The company has recommended that users withdraw their funds as soon as possible.

From March 2024, Aztec will no longer run a sequencer, meaning the current system will no longer publish rollup blocks processing Aztec Connect transactions. “Contract permissions will be renounced, and all rollup functionality will be ceased,” the announcement reads. However, Aztec has fully open-sourced the entire Aztec Connect protocol, and it encourages the Aztec community to fork, deploy, and operate a new version of the system. “We’d love to see an independently-operated Aztec Connect and are ready to fund it,” Aztec said.

According to the announcement, the shutdown of Aztec Connect marks a milestone in the development of a decentralized general-use encrypted blockchain. Before launching Aztec Connect in July 2022, Aztec first experimented with using a zk-Rollup with Aztec 1, which was “slow, inefficient, costly” and limited in functionality to “basic private transfers.”

Aztec’s focus on privacy has been a significant factor in its popularity among blockchain users. Its privacy infrastructure is designed to help users protect their financial data and transaction history from third-party entities, thereby maintaining their privacy. The company has been developing privacy-oriented solutions to improve the efficiency and security of blockchain-based financial transactions.

The closure of Aztec Connect is a significant move for the blockchain platform, but it remains to be seen how the Aztec community will react to the news. As the company has encouraged the community to fork, deploy, and operate a new version of the system, it is possible that a new, independently-operated version of Aztec Connect may emerge in the future. However, for now, users of the platform will need to withdraw their funds before the closure of the service on March 21, 2024.


Tagged : / / / / /

Circle Partners with Cross River Bank for USDC Production and Redemption

Circle, a leading global crypto finance company, has announced that it has partnered with Cross River Bank for producing and redeeming USD Coin (USDC), its flagship stablecoin pegged to the US dollar. Cross River Bank is a recognized leader in providing banking services to fintech and crypto firms, including Visa and Coinbase. In addition to Cross River Bank, Circle has also expanded relationships with other banking partners to assist with USDC redemption, including Bank of New York Mellon (BNY Mellon), which already provides custody services for Circle’s reserves.

The announcement comes after a harrowing weekend that saw Circle’s flagship USDC stablecoin break its peg to the dollar, falling below $0.90 early on Saturday. However, a series of moves by banks and regulators restored confidence in the token, and at the time of publication, USDC has recovered and trades at $0.99.

During the weekend, Circle issued a press release confirming that 100% of USDC reserves are safe and secure. The company also announced that it would complete the transfer of the remaining Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) cash to BNY Mellon, and liquidity operations for USDC will resume at banking open on Monday.

Circle’s announcement also noted that it had no exposure to Silvergate, the crypto-friendly bank that announced it would voluntarily liquidate its holdings as part of a takeover process by federal regulators. This weekend’s USDC turmoil was part of a broader financial catastrophe that started due to the collapse of SVB, the 16th-largest bank in the United States and a financial pillar of the tech and venture capital world. The failure of SVB triggered a panic as thousands of companies, including Circle, could not access billions in deposits. However, the Federal Reserve and other agencies calmed markets by announcing that depositors at SBV would be made whole.

Circle’s partnership with Cross River Bank and other banking partners is a significant step towards strengthening the stability and reliability of USDC, especially in the wake of recent events. Cross River Bank has a reputation for providing banking services to fintech and crypto firms and has been recognized for its services to Visa and Coinbase. BNY Mellon, on the other hand, already provides custody services for Circle’s reserves, making it a natural fit for assisting with USDC redemption.

Overall, Circle’s partnership with Cross River Bank and other banking partners underscores the importance of reliable banking partnerships for the stablecoin industry, which is still in its nascent stages. As the industry grows and matures, more partnerships like these are likely to emerge, providing greater stability and reliability for stablecoins like USDC.


Tagged : / / / / / /

Okcoin Halts U.S. Dollar Deposits After Signature Bank Shutdown

Okcoin, the U.S. affiliate of cryptocurrency exchange OKX, announced on March 13 that it had no exposure to defunct U.S. tech bank Silicon Valley Bank (SVB). However, Okcoin CEO Hong Fang stated that the platform’s U.S. dollar wire and ACH deposits had been “immediately paused” due to the regulatory intervention in Signature Bank, Okcoin’s primary partner for customer transactions in dollars.

On March 12, New York state regulators closed Signature Bank, a major financial institution for fiat-crypto on-ramping, citing a “systemic risk exception” in the wake of SVB’s collapse. In addition to suspending dollar deposits, Fang wrote that “over-the-counter services will be temporarily paused too,” including its quick buy and recurring buy functions. Okcoin also stated that the suspension extends to “crypto transactions by credit card” and “trading USD-crypto trading pairs.”

Fang reassured users that “all corporate and all customer funds are safe” and that “USD withdrawal not affected. The processing pace will be subject to bank operation.” All crypto deposit and withdrawal functions remain intact, including those of U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoins. Furthermore, the suspension appears limited to dollar deposits, as other fiat deposit methods, such as those made in euros, are unaffected.

Okcoin is working to find alternative channels and solutions in real-time, and the suspension is not expected to impact crypto transactions significantly. Fang emphasized the platform’s commitment to its users, stating, “If this weekend has told us anything, it’s the significance of the future that we are building. Our commitment to you hasn’t changed either.”

The crypto-friendly Signature Bank was a key partner for many crypto firms, including Coinbase, Celsius, and Paxos, which have since disclosed that they held balances in the bank. U.S. federal regulators have stated that Signature Bank depositors will receive their balances in full post-shutdown.

The shutdown of Signature Bank has raised concerns in the crypto community about the risks associated with fiat-crypto on-ramping and the importance of selecting reliable banking partners. While Okcoin has assured its users that their funds are safe, the incident highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in the crypto industry.


Tagged : / / / / /
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 41,405.09 4.30%
Ethereum (ETH) $ 2,218.31 2.64%
Litecoin (LTC) $ 72.97 1.63%
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) $ 247.86 8.90%