A Bitcoin whale is transferring hundreds of millions of dollars worth of BTC in the midst of a correction that’s impacting the broader crypto markets.
According to blockchain tracker Whale Alert, the massive crypto holder moved exactly 10,000 BTC from multiple wallet addresses coming from Bitcoin-custodial firm Xapo to the global crypto exchange Binance. At the time of the transfer, the Bitcoin stash was worth nearly $608.8 million.
🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 10,000 #BTC (608,797,100 USD) transferred from #Xapo to #Binancehttps://t.co/aLlyGU2YTS
— Whale Alert (@whale_alert) November 18, 2021
The large Bitcoin whale paid 0.00005752 BTC, worth $3.37 at time of writing, in transaction fees for the transfer. Bitcoin is currently exchanging hands at $58,612.
Whale Alert is also reporting other large Bitcoin transactions in the last 48 hours amid the crypto market pullback. Three transactions involve whales moving hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Bitcoin between crypto exchanges.
In two transactions, whales withdrew nearly $250 million worth of Bitcoin from Coinbase. Other transactions saw whales moving BTC between Xapo and crypto exchanges.
Here’s the summary of some of the whale transactions in the last two days:
Check Price Action
Don’t Miss a Beat – Subscribe to get crypto email alerts delivered directly to your inbox
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Telegram
Surf The Daily Hodl Mix
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed at The Daily Hodl are not investment advice. Investors should do their due diligence before making any high-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrency or digital assets. Please be advised that your transfers and trades are at your own risk, and any loses you may incur are your responsibility. The Daily Hodl does not recommend the buying or selling of any cryptocurrencies or digital assets, nor is The Daily Hodl an investment advisor. Please note that The Daily Hodl participates in affiliate marketing.
Featured Image: Shutterstock/Tithi Luadthong/Natalia Siiatovskaia
Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton thinks cryptocurrencies could threaten the dominance of the US dollar and the stability of many nations.
Appearing in a Bloomberg panel to discuss “the new global order,” Clinton speaks on a wide variety of topics ranging from trade policy to foreign relations with China and Russia.
The 2016 Democratic Party presidential nominee predicts that “the rise of artificial intelligence” will threaten nation-states and multinational corporations.
She also believes crypto could have a negative impact on the US dollar and pose a threat to the stability of small and large nations.
“One more area that I hope nation-states start paying greater attention to is the rise of cryptocurrency because what looks like a very interesting and somewhat exotic effort to literally mine new coins in order to trade with them, has the potential for undermining currencies, for undermining the role of the dollar as the reserve currency, for destabilizing nations, perhaps starting with small ones but going much larger.”
Clinton also appears to suggest that China’s blanket ban on all crypto-related business activities is a wise approach.
“It appears as though China is going to prevent outside technology payment systems, like the cryptocurrency development, from playing a big role inside China, because I think they recognize – given their nationalism – perhaps earlier than other nations in the US, Europe, elsewhere, that this could be a direct threat to sovereignty.
So when we’re talking about making decisions and trying to be strategic and building alliances, there’s a whole new layer of activity that could be extremely destabilizing, and, in the wrong hands or in alliances with the wrong people, could be direct threats to many of our nation-states and certainly to the global currency markets.”
[embedded content]
I
Check Price Action
Don’t Miss a Beat – Subscribe to get crypto email alerts delivered directly to your inbox
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Telegram
Surf The Daily Hodl Mix
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed at The Daily Hodl are not investment advice. Investors should do their due diligence before making any high-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrency or digital assets. Please be advised that your transfers and trades are at your own risk, and any loses you may incur are your responsibility. The Daily Hodl does not recommend the buying or selling of any cryptocurrencies or digital assets, nor is The Daily Hodl an investment advisor. Please note that The Daily Hodl participates in affiliate marketing.
Headquarters of the Swiss Stock Exchange (Boerse) operated by the SIX group in Zurich (Photo by … [+]Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP)
AFP via Getty Images
Momentous events do not appear to be significant when they happen. Scarcely anyone noticed when the bitcoin paper was uploaded to the cypherpunks mailing list back in 2009. Now, it has spawned a few new industries and shaken up many established industries. Similarly, the release of the first digital bond in a regulated market announced by SIX yesterday did not cause any significant waves. Of course, it is unfair to compare the effects of the release of a homegrown piece of code by a lone wolf to the actions of an institution like the Swiss Stock Exchange. However, both are linked through the data-structure of the blockchain.
The bond market is relatively staid, however it does not lack drama, such as the Argentinian sovereign default and its attendant tussles or the near destruction of the global financial system by bonds backed by US sub-prime mortgages. Bonds are considered a safer bet as the seniority of bond debt makes them less risky. The SIFMA capital markets factbook for 2021 states that global bond markets outstanding value increased by 16.5% to $123.5 trillion in 2020, while global long-term bond issuance increased by 19.9% to $27.3 trillion. Contrast that to the global equity market capitalization which increased by 18.2% year-over-year to $105.8 trillion in 2020, mostly fueled by increases in stock prices. Yearly bond issuance dwarfs the issuance of equities. Equities are a perpetual instrument, while bonds have a term and often pay a recurring or built in coupon.
A press release from the Swiss Exchange dated November 18, states that SIX placed the first senior unsecured digital CHF bond with a total volume of CHF 150 million and maturity in 2026. The bond is innovative because it consists of two exchangeable parts linked together. The digital part (Part A) of the bond for CHF 100 million and the traditional part (Part B) of the bond for CHF 50 million. Each will be traded and held in different structural sub-organs of the exchange. The coupon amounts to an anemic 0.125% per year. This is par for the course for bonds, a safe instrument, it was heavily oversubscribed. In effect, the returns are negative if you take inflation into account; in that it is better than cash. The net proceeds of the bond will be used for general financing purposes of SIX.
The DLT used was R3’s Corda. Corda is not a blockchain according to many including its CEO. Under the covers, Corda is backed by a micro-ledger, a mini blockchain. This bond issuance is a test run for the SIX Digital Exchange, which is a manifestation of the SIX mandate to operate infrastructure services.
In digital bonds, for trading, for custody, for post trade operations and processes, standards matter. Bonds cannot be said to be fully digital until the common operations can be automated and digitized. Calculation of coupon payments and value underpins risk analysis and secondary markets, which operate on price depend on bond attributes. A lack of standards bedevils the bond world. This is natural for instruments that have evolved over hundreds of years, if not thousands. Standards development organizations such as the InterWork Alliance (IWA) are important in this context.
MORE FOR YOU
Now known as IWA, a GBBC project; IWA started as the Token Taxonomy Initiative inside the Enterprise Ethereum Association (EEA). The DNA of the EEA is Ethereum and its rich suite of de facto token standards. These de facto standards have caused a revolution in crypto-currencies and created DAOs, DeFi itself and an explosion of NFTs. This revolution is now spreading to other public and private blockchains. The TTI started the The Token Taxonomy Framework (TTF) which is open sourced on github. TTF defines a set of basic building blocks of a token language. This token language is spoken in a platform neutral way. In other words, the token can be built on Solana, on Hyperledger Fabric, on Polychain as long as the token and its interface and attributes can be implemented. The token behaves in a strictly deterministic way. It is also possible to reason about the value of the token, as well as deal with emergent properties with built in circuit-breakers and other guard-rails.
The basic definition of any TTF digital token is expressed using a short token formula. From this token formula, a series of artifacts, from the code for templates of functions to business functionality is generated. This ensures that everyone, from technologists to business users to compliance folks work from the same functional specification. These are standards for the modern age, that contains tooling to generate all, including a visual representation of a token. A series of purpose built artifacts all generated from the token formula. A digital token is the base of an ecosystem that for any instrument also consists of contracts between counterparties and analytics built on the interaction between the token and the contracts, thus building what is in effect a multi-party system that powers the lifecycle of an instrument. This is the key to digitizing instruments such as bonds that have existed since the Mesopotamian times.
This realization led to the creation of the Inter Work Alliance based on the TTF as a foundation. So far, the story has a through line that arouses skepticism in people who have been battle-hardened by working in Capital Markets tussling with the broken and fragmented financial market infrastructure. This is a real challenge for adoption by business types in traditional fnance. A certain amount of skepticism, a healthy suspicion of blockchain which many associate with Bitcoin and a sense of deja vu. The merger of IWA with the Global Blockchain Business Council addresses this issue head-on. GBBC, founded by the indefatigable Sandra Ro, is one of the most influential Blockchain Industry associations with more than 350 institutional members and 70 jurisdictions. The GBBC along with the World Economic Forum had already started on a survey of Blockchain standards called GSMI. The natural next step is to partner with an organization who have a pedigree in standards development. The merger between the IWA and GBBC was announced in September and was completed recently.
In the meantime the IWA has not been idle. The sustainability working group has been the most active and have created token standards to track the various forms of the voluntary emissions market. This market based approach covers both emission allowances and carbon offsets and tackles the top-of-of the mind topic brought to the fore by COP26. These sort of initiatives may help humanity escape the “blah-bah-blah” mentality that constrains us. A market based approach cannot work if emission allowances are huge and carbon offsets are priced low. Of course the pricing of these offsets have to be prohibitive and traceable for the world to escape the singularity of a greater than 1.5 degree rise in average temperatures. Nothing in the VEM standards stands in the way of these eventualities.
The standard for digital bonds, when a simple formula fans out into an implementation that every party on a multi-party system can agree on and automatically generates a variety of tools for creating and monitoring bond behavior in a platform neutral way, with extensions to price and risk manage digital bonds, it creates cost efficiencies. Bringing down the costs will democratize the investment landscape and make participation more decentralized. Furthermore, viewing the bond through the prism of standards, unlocks the possibilities for new behaviors and new products. Thus revolution and evolution are unleashed through standards. A new working group has been reanimated inside the IWA to look at debt capital markets. This group is composed of both traditional players and new actors with all the tools of the TTF at their disposal. GBBC is poised to amplify that message and take it to many enterprises and jurisdictions.
The U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is revealing that it confiscated billions of dollars in cryptocurrency during the 2021 fiscal year.
The IRS says in a report that its Criminal Investigation’s Cyber Crime Unit (CI CCU) seized approximately $3.5 billion in cryptocurrency this year. The amount constituted an overwhelming proportion of the total amount of assets that CI confiscated during the same period.
“$3.5B CRYPTOCURRENCY SEIZED
93% OF ALL CI SEIZURES”
Some of the notable cryptocurrency seizures by the IRS involve amounts consisting of up to hundreds of millions of dollars.
In November of 2020, more than $1 billion in Bitcoin (BTC) linked to the Silk Road online drug marketplace was seized from an Individual X who had hacked the coins from Silk Road. Silk Road creator Ross Ulbricht was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment six years ago. A blockchain intelligence firm made the discovery of the Silk Road Bitcoin that had previously gone undetected.
Says the IRS,
“CCU special agents and personnel used a third-party Bitcoin attribution company to analyze bitcoin transactions executed by Silk Road and were able to identify 54 previously undetected Bitcoin transactions executed by Silk Road, which were the proceeds of unlawful activity, stolen from Silk Road in or about 2012 and 2013.
These funds were traced to a bitcoin address. Further investigation of that Bitcoin address by CCU special agents & personnel revealed that the funds were connected to Individual X. It was further determined that Individual X had hacked the funds from Silk Road.
Pursuant to the investigation of the hack, CCU special agents seized several thousand Bitcoins on November 3, 2020. On November 4, 2020, the seized Bitcoin had a value of over $1 billion.”
Earlier this year, the CCU took down the dark web’s decade-old Bitcoin money-laundering service known as Bitcoin Fog which is suspected to have moved over 1.2 million Bitcoin worth around $335 million at the time of the transactions.
The CCU also successfully investigated a Microsoft employee who used Bitcoin to launder over $10 million obtained from the sale of the tech giant’s stolen gift cards.
Bitcoin is currently trading at $57,580.
Check Price Action
Don’t Miss a Beat – Subscribe to get crypto email alerts delivered directly to your inbox
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Telegram
Surf The Daily Hodl Mix
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed at The Daily Hodl are not investment advice. Investors should do their due diligence before making any high-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrency or digital assets. Please be advised that your transfers and trades are at your own risk, and any loses you may incur are your responsibility. The Daily Hodl does not recommend the buying or selling of any cryptocurrencies or digital assets, nor is The Daily Hodl an investment advisor. Please note that The Daily Hodl participates in affiliate marketing.
Featured Image: Shutterstock/Susanitah/Dario Lo Presti
If the words “derivatives trading” conjures up images of men in suits with disheveled white sleeves rolled up to the elbows and exacerbated expressions on their faces — like something out of The Big Short — then the word decentralized exchanges (DEXs) must conjure up, well, nothing.
There are no offices, no floor traders waving papers and certainly no men in suits. DEXs are managed automatically or semi-automatically with the involvement of platform participants in the process of making mission-critical decisions. DEXs are a bulb of a system that is sprouting groundbreaking opportunities for many, but they are not yet suited for the soil of derivatives trading in this season of the crypto market.
The technological gap
The technology isn’t available right now to have a proper options market on a DEX with the level of sophistication that you find in the traditional space. Current offerings, therefore, suffer from capital inefficiencies, poor pricing and added risk for traders. Instead of tech first, the people must be put first and the tech layered in as it matures, providing decentralization in progressive components. The success of dYdX’s hybrid approach of a centralized order book with decentralized custody shows that this is the viable route for a full derivatives options suite as well.
The percentage of DEX to centralized exchanged (CEX) spot trade volume was at 9% in June, which was the peak of the regulatory crackdown.
You can also see that during this time, dYdX also recorded an $11.6 million spike in revenue in August — leading to a higher adoption rate of DEX, thanks in part to its hybrid approach.
A more centralized hybrid approach provides the opportunity for the usage of these sophisticated financial tools sooner and at scale. Rigidly prioritizing true decentralization over a more centralized hybrid approach is a noble one, but it delays the accessibility of these financially transformative opportunities.
User experience powering the way
Central exchanges are a gateway to a larger audience that is not yet comfortable with the full self-custodial experience. Not everyone wants to have self custody of their funds. The fact that you could lose your entire life savings by misplacing a piece of paper is a pretty scary concept.
For example, when looking at the chart below, you can see that the volume, which can be inferred as a certain percentage of new entrants into crypto, tends to flow to more centralized exchanges.
Tom Bilyeau, co-founder and CEO of Impact Theory, might be the perfect anecdotal example of this preference of centralized exchange sentiment over decentralized exchanges. Tom is relatively new to crypto, he knows he “should” self-custody his assets. In an honest admission in his recent interview with Robert Breedlove, however, he explains his preference to keep his crypto on an exchange because of the security and friction of the alternative process. Of course, Twitter was buzzing with “don’t be like Tom,” counternarratives, but if we want to grow as an industry, we can’t write stuff like this off. Tom is going through the same crypto-adoption lifecycle of many people. There is a large segment of the population that doesn’t want to even think about security. They want exchanges to take on the counterparty risk so they can go on living their lives.
This is valid, if for no greater reason than this sentiment merely exists just as the self-sovereign vision of the Crypto-Utopiates is valid.
Of course, there are solutions to solve this and a variety of reasons people might prefer to self-custody, but the fact remains that this is not an ideal experience for everyone. The point here is that we must meet people where they’re at.
Related:Decentralization vs. centralization: Where does the future lie? Experts answer
The future is accessible for everyone
Cryptocurrency is a massive financial literacy project. Take, for instance, the subprime mortgage crisis in 2007. The problem was not that complicated derivatives tools, like tranches or CMOs, were inherently wrong, it was the fact that there was no transparency or audibility of the products that were being sold. Unseen risks resided in the system that no one knew existed and then it collapsed. With crypto, everything in the entire financial stack is fully transparent and auditable in real-time. Out of necessity, people learn about margin systems, lending systems and other traditional and complex concepts that were otherwise unappealing or unavailable to them.
Centralized crypto exchanges know that anyone can learn, audit and shift their assets to another platform if they’re not satisfied, which holds exchanges accountable. Unlike banks, users can withdraw their assets directly to the blockchain. Exchanges need to do right by the user, lest they go elsewhere. In a DEX, this is a glaring accountability gap. If something goes wrong, who is behind there to help fix the mess?
This is especially important when you consider that, according to a report by crypto research company Messari, DeFi protocols have lost about $284.9 million to hacks and other exploit attacks since 2019. At this point in time, the decentralized insurance industry only covers a fraction of the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi, which represents the sum of all assets deposited in DeFi protocols earning rewards, interest, new coins and tokens, fixed income, etc.
With new DeFi hacks popping up in crypto in what feels like every other day, centralized exchanges or custodians that can offer greater peace of mind through insurance and counterparty risk are the smoothest on-ramps for the industry.
Decentralization is the end goal
Of course, decentralization is the end goal. Users controlling their own assets is ideal. Directionally, this is where the industry is headed, but we can’t ask that users jump in before the tech is ready at their expense. The onus is on technologists to get decentralized technologies where they need to be first. DEXs conceivably hold great promise for the future of derivatives trading, but not at the cost of security, speed and availability for all.
This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.
The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.
Tom Howard, business development and growth at PowerTrade, is a product geek, founder and angel investor obsessed with reinventing money and finance. As an early investor in cryptocurrencies and founding partner of blockchain investment group Taureon, Tom has seen it all from the booms and busts to the massive challenges users face when trying to use cryptocurrencies as electronic cash. As co-founder of DeFi Nation and formerly co-founder of Mosendo, Tom brings his immense knowledge of decentralization to the crypto derivatives world.
The Israeli pensioner Esther Freeman has reportedly turned an ILS 10,000 Bitcoin investment, worth roughly $3K at that time, into ILS 1,000,000 (~$324K) in eight years. However, Hapoalim Bank – one of the largest in the country – denied accepting the profits as the initial investment source might have had a connection to illegal financial operations.
Cash Is The Problem
In 2013 a 69-year old retired citizen of Israel, Esther Freeman, decided to enter the cryptocurrency market by investing around $3,240. Despite her 69 years, the pensioner said she is “young in spirit” and that her younger relatives mainly influenced her decision:
“I listened to my son and nephews, to the young guys, and said that an attempt would be made. Without any knowledge on the subject, in the real innocence of an ordinary citizen. I never thought that NIS 10,000 would become almost NIS 1 million.”
Esther Freeman. Source: YNET
Even though Freeman has multiplied her investment by 100 times, Bank Hapoalim refused to deposit the amount transferred from the FIAT-cryptocurrency platform she used as the initial deposit years ago was made in cash.
Therefore, the source of the funds might have related to ‘money-laundering or terrorist financing,’ the bank explained. Furthermore, the institution outlined some of the notorious dark sides of the digital asset industry that banks typically provide:
ADVERTISEMENT
“The characteristics of virtual (i.e., digital) currencies allow them to be transferred anonymously and unsupervised, often bypassing the need to use the financial factors that apply to the anti-money laundering and terrorist financing regime.”
To have a better chance to obtain her funds, Freeman appointed Shaul Zioni as her law attorney and opened a lawsuit against the bank. The pensioner said that over the years, she had been a loyal client to the bank, and she needs the money so she can help one of her children:
“The bank knows my conduct. I have no money anywhere else, only at Bank Hapoalim. They know I do not launder capital or do business outside the bank. I am retired. All four of my children have bank accounts. The money I need to help one of my children buy an apartment.”
Freeman’s law attorney – Shaul Zioni – also spoke on the matter. He noted that his client wants the court to declare that the source of money invested in bitcoin is “known, clear and supported by references.” Over the years, Freeman has kept her Bitcoin in various digital wallets, in which no further transactions have been made, Zioni added.
Subsequently, the court ruled that the financial institution should not restrict account activity to its clients only because they are linked to digital currencies. Bank Hapoalim has received the case and vowed to study its details and “respond in the usual way.”
Israel Wants to Treat Cryptocurrency Businesses Like Banks
Due to the risks of using digital assets in criminal activities, Israel’s authorities recently planned to apply anti-terror banking rules.
As of now, the government had to spend significant resources to uncover fraud in areas where companies were not obliged to report all financial operations. If the new policy goes live, all crypto-related firms will need to make reports like banks.
The new rules should also benefit small digital asset enterprises as the reporting promises to be accessible and modernized. As such, those companies could provide greater confidence in the safety of their services.
SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)
Binance Free $100 (Exclusive): Use this link to register and receive $100 free and 10% off fees on Binance Futures first month (terms).
PrimeXBT Special Offer: Use this link to register & enter POTATO50 code to get 50% free bonus on any deposit up to $1750.
Decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms have been the target of criminal attacks this year. Investors in the blockchain-based form of financehave lost billions of dollars to criminals that target the platforms.
The total amount of money deposited at DeFi services has spiked from just $500 million in 2019 to $247 billion this year.
Related Reading | Dog-Themed DeFi Project Mysteriously Loses Fundraised $60 Million
5 BTC + 300 Free Spins for new players & 15 BTC + 35.000 Free Spins every month, only at mBitcasino. Play Now!
According to a reportfrom London-based firm Elliptic, the overall losses caused by DeFi exploits have totaled $12 billion in the past year. Out of that amount, fraud and theft accounted for $10.5 billion, seven times the amount last year.
DeFi, which has drawn in billions of dollars in investor funds, has also been a frequent target by hackers. They exploit poorly protected protocols, mostly using flash loans.
Related Reading | Poly Network Confirms Hacker Has Returned Most Of The Stolen Crypto
Get 110 USDT Futures Bonus for FREE!
One of the popular attacks this year was the Poly Network hack. Hackers exploited a vulnerability in the multi-chain interoperability protocol. And they took off with roughly $600 million worth of various cryptocurrencies. They however returned most of the stolen funds.
DeFi – The Wild West Of Cryptocurrencies
Elliptic is a firm that tracks movements of funds on the digital ledgers that underpin cryptocurrencies. It recently reported that DeFi exploits amounted to $12 billion this year.
DeFi is often called the “Wild West” of cryptocurrencies because it is still the most unregulated area of crypto. DeFi platforms allow users to lend, borrow and save – usually in cryptocurrencies – without any involvement from middlemen like banks.
“The DeFi ecosystem is an incredibly exciting and fast-moving space, with financial services innovation happening at light speed,” said Tom Robinson, chief scientist at Elliptic. “This is attracting large amounts of capital to projects that are not always robust or well-tested. Criminal actors have seen the opportunity to exploit this.”
According to the report, the underlying technology of DeFi is built on open infrastructure. However, that technology is “relatively immature and untested.” There are bugs in code as well as design flaws that enable criminals to target the platforms.
DeFi market cap at $165.47B | Source: Crypto Total DeFi Market Cap on TradingView.com
“Decentralized apps are designed to be trustless in that they eliminate any third-party control of users’ funds,” said Robinson. “But you must still trust that the creators of the protocol have not made a coding or design mistake that could lead to a loss of funds.”
Criminals can also easily launder proceeds of crime while leaving few traces. “The irreversible nature of crypto transactions make it very challenging to recover these funds,” says the report.
Call For Regulation
With the alarming number of exploits the space is facing, there are calls for DeFi regulation. Regulators are now also turning attention to the sector. However, the actions of regulators in the coming months will play a significant role in determining how well they thrive in the future.
Featured image from Aergo, Chart from TradingView.com
Zcash maintainer Electric Coin Company is releasing an official wallet.
Zcash will be moving to a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism over the next three years.
ECC is also thinking of adding Zcash to the Cosmos stack.
Yesterday, Electric Coin Company, the organization behindprivacy coinZcash, outlined its official roadmap for the next three years. Within hours, the price of Zcash rallied from $147 to $189, an increase of 28.6%.
The privacy-focused organization said in a blog post that it’ll release an official ECC wallet in 2022, before moving Zcash from a proof-of-work consensus mechanism to the more environmentally friendly proof-of-stake model within the next three years.
Electric Coin Company says it wants Zcash to be a key player in the emergence of Web 3.0–a vision where data is interconnected in a fully decentralized way, giving each user their own sovereign slice of the web.
In society’s collective vision of the coming decentralized web, people will have total control over their information; the ECC believes that privacy will be a big part of the fabric of this next iteration.
Privacy coins: a primer
Zcash and its main rival, Monero, are examples of privacy coins. Using cryptographic techniques, they obscure identifying information like addresses and transaction amounts from prying eyes.
The coin uses a cryptographic technique called zero-knowledge proofs, which lets you make transactions without specifying any details about the transactions in question, other than the fact that they are legitimate. While Monero only allows for private transactions, Zcash also allows for public ones.
Zcash launched on October 28, 2016, two years after Monero. It was originally based on Bitcoin’s codebase and, like Bitcoin, its supply is capped at 21 million coins. Today Zcash has a market cap of around $2.3 billion, about $2 billion less than Monero.
A day after it launched, Zcash hit an all-time high of $5941, though since then its price has been in decline. It hit a brief high of $880 on July 1, 2018 but spent most of the next two years trading well under $100.
Things picked up again this year. In mid-February, the price of Zcash hit $180 and it hasn’t fallen below $100 since. On May 8, it set a yearly high of $318 and slinked back down again, but news of ECC’s new roadmap has caused the price to rally this weekend.
The ECC Roadmap
In the blog post, ECC said that the first step of its roadmap will be the release of an official wallet in 2022. Through the wallet, the company can interact with Zcash users directly, allowing ECC to “rapidly rollout new features that may or may not require changes to the protocol.”
ECC also announced that the code for the official wallet will be open-source and that wallet developers can expect the release of a software development kit in the future.
ECC is also migrating the blockchain from an energy-intensive proof-of-work consensus mechanism, where miners that have the most computing power validate the most transactions, to a proof-of-stake model, where miners that stake the most Zcash validate the most transactions.
The transition to proof-of-stake will reduce Zcash’s carbon footprint and, hopes ECC, reduce the downward price pressure on Zcash. At the moment, most miners immediately liquidate their Zcash earnings to pay the high energy bills that come with proof-of-work mining. With proof-of-stake, they won’t have to.
The last part of ECC’s roadmap focuses on interoperability. As the company completes the transition to a proof-of-stake model, new opportunities for cross-chain interoperability will arise, like using interoperability networkCosmos.
Clearly, ECC hopes Zcash will outgrow its reputation as a privacy coin as more utility gets added to it in the coming years.